Log on:
Powered by Elgg

CCC development :: Blog :: LifeWork planning for your death

April 28, 2006

LifeWork planning for your death

Keywords: 20%, 2010, 2Q10-3, death, hph, hubbard, LifeWork planning for your death, move

Posted by Pete Hubbard (LWPS Founder) @ CCC development


Comments

  1. Go for it.



    I'll ask Sally to Mark this post and work with us to add Qs and design it.



    Can you upload your draft to your server and reply with a link to it here so I can add it to the post above? I can't get to my server till my laptop is returned next week.

    user iconPete Hubbard on Friday, 05 May 2006, 12:46 EDT # |

  2. Pete:



    The letter looks great.

    I will get the questionnaire going and upload the draft for you to review.

    I learned some great stuff the last two classes, creating an online form to fill insert, update or delete an existing db initially created in Access. Today we were given an overview of securing a login and how to create a blank record and add it to the server. Both of these features are amazing and I am anxious to spend more time learning and using them! Here is a link to my final for you to see the latest fun with php http://www.dreamweaversite.com/virginia/csa266_virginiafinal_forms.php

    user iconVirginia Chomiak on Sunday, 07 May 2006, 12:39 EDT # |

  3. Virginia,



    Looks great.

    user iconPete Hubbard on Sunday, 07 May 2006, 12:51 EDT # |

  4. Sally added this comment to another post:
    If you send participants of PDI Stage 1 and suggest that if they want to get a head start on the PDI, then they go through that Stage, then we might see how the learning is proceding and have a better idea on where we want to concentrate in the PDI.




    Originally, I wanted to do this, but have since decided not to for two reasons. If some learn enough about LWPS before the PDI, they 1) may cancel and not attend, and 2) they may ask quesstions about things we did not plan to cover - thus causing a disruption.



    What do you think?

    user iconPete Hubbard on Sunday, 14 May 2006, 13:59 EDT # |

  5. Put following in quotes. Either you use quotes throughout when introducing a new term or delte all quotes.



    Under Results:



    2.c. "Internet Presence" (add end quote after Presence")

    2.j. "folksonomic tag" (put in quotes)

    2.m. "ePortfolio" (put in quotes)

    2.p. "Wickipedia"

    2.q. "Wicki"

    2.n. "RSS feed"



    Delete all "some" (too nebulous)



    3.c.i. "definitely not interested" in doing career cybercounseling(check spelling of "definitely", delete "some")

    3.c.ii. "moderately not interested" in doing career cybercounseling

    3.c.iii. "neutral

    3.c.iv. "moderately interested" in doing career cybercounseling

    3.c.v. "definitely interested" in doing career cybercounseling (check spelling of "definitely")

    user iconSally Gelardin on Monday, 15 May 2006, 12:42 EDT # |

  6. Sally,



    (6) 2. We'll remove the quotes.



    3. Why do you want quotes in 3.c.i - v?

    user iconPete Hubbard on Monday, 15 May 2006, 14:16 EDT # |

  7. Sally,

    Would you like check boxes in 3 c.i - c.v in a sentence format with a check box or numbered as above witha checkbox.

    user iconVirginia Chomiak on Tuesday, 16 May 2006, 10:31 EDT # |

  8. Virginia,



    Sally was referring to my Summary report of the Q, not the Q you put together. Your Q has one box for this question 3, where they indicate 1-5.

    user iconPete Hubbard on Tuesday, 16 May 2006, 11:21 EDT # |

  9. Thanks for the clarification Pete.

    user iconVirginia Chomiak on Tuesday, 16 May 2006, 12:14 EDT # |

  10. Sally added this comment to another post:
    If you send participants of PDI Stage 1 and suggest that if they want to get a head start on the PDI, then they go through that Stage, then we might see how the learning is proceding and have a better idea on where we want to concentrate in the PDI.




    Originally, I wanted to do this, but have since decided not to for two reasons. If some learn enough about LWPS before the PDI, they 1) may cancel and not attend, and 2) they may ask quesstions about things we did not plan to cover - thus causing a disruption.



    What do you think?

    user iconPete Hubbard on Tuesday, 16 May 2006, 13:57 EDT # |

  11. I've made a few changes/additions to the pre-conference e-mail above. As soon as I get the attendees e-mail addresses from Bobbie, I will send it out BCC to all and you. Let me know if you me to change anything.



    Also, please delete comments that you made here that are no longer relevant.

    user iconPete Hubbard on Monday, 05 June 2006, 09:00 EDT # |

You must be logged in to post a comment.